Reader Stories

Notes from consultation clients and regular library readers working on Solana token distribution.

Our team had three different versions of the tokenomics spreadsheet circulating in Slack. The distribution review forced us to reconcile them in one session. Soo-yeon walked through each tranche and showed us where our community allocation math double-counted early testers.
Ravi MehtaHead of operations, cross-chain bridge project
I used the Launch Playbook while drafting our investor deck. The section on liquidity bootstrapping pools helped me explain why we chose an LBP instead of a fixed-price IDO — though I wish there were more Korean-language examples for local LPs.
Kim Yeon-wooFounder, Seoul infrastructure startup
The glossary workshop was dense — we covered about 40 terms in an hour. A couple of our junior developers said it moved too fast, but for me as the CFO it was the right pace. We reference the PDF handout weekly.
Thomas BergCFO, European gaming token project
Min-jun's written follow-up after our extended review listed eleven specific changes to our vesting schedule. We implemented eight of them before TGE. The other three we kept after discussing trade-offs with our lead investor.
Aisha RahmanToken economics lead, DeFi protocol
I read the fair launch article before committing to a launchpad. It clarified that "fair" means different things to LPs, airdrop farmers, and core contributors. Saved me from copying a template that did not fit our contributor base.
Lucas FernandezIndependent researcher, Buenos Aires
Response time on the contact form was slower than the three-day estimate — took five days to get a session slot. Once booked, the review itself was thorough and the summary document was well organized.
Choi Min-seokCommunity lead, NFT marketplace

Case note: Restructuring a four-tranche vesting plan before mainnet

Client: A six-person team building a Solana payments SDK, preparing for TGE in Q2 2026.

Challenge: Team, advisors, ecosystem fund, and public sale tranches all had 12-month cliffs ending within the same two-week window. Early modeling showed a 34% circulating supply jump at month twelve.

Session: Extended distribution review over two half-day calls. We mapped unlock events on a shared timeline, identified the clustering issue, and proposed staggered cliff dates plus a small monthly team unlock starting at month six.

Outcome: Client adopted staggered cliffs and published the revised vesting schedule in their documentation two weeks before the public sale announcement. Follow-up Q&A covered smart contract implementation questions with their developer.

Learn about distribution reviews →